![]() I just posted on another blog by this author about UML. My main evaluation factor for a tool was. Net code engineering, sturdy UML diagramming with good navigational capabilities such as "Jump to code/model tree/diagram/hyperlinks etc" and Undo/Redo. UModel: After evaluating several tools, I have ended up with the relatively new Altova UModel 2008. UModel integrates very well within Visual Studio, but it is a tad bit unstable at times but nothing critical. Word documents can also be imported by using the proper plugins. The information is available in Excel and you can get started by importing the artifacts in the proper structure. The hexagonal architecture diagram is called hexagonal because it is typically represented by a hexagon with the business logic at the center and the external interfaces at the edges. I find it way better than Sparxx Enterprise Architect. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is well suited for a client that does not have any Enterprise Architecture or Business Process and that needs to get started. Visual Paradigm using this comparison chart. In Visual Paradigm, it's also easy to set up the project with team members. Visual Paradigm is better for collaboration if you consider, for example, versioning, so this is another valuable tool feature that's simple and embedded in the solution. These guys are constantly adding new features and offer great professional support. Visual Paradigm is the perfect tool for me, and I prefer it over Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. $139 to $199ĮA: EA lacks a whole bunch of basic stuff for UML software designers but it seems to be a hit with documentation and process oriented folks who are content with abstract UML. ![]() It does not have Undo/Redo outside of the diagram pane. The UML diagrams seem to be "lightweight" almost like a drawing tool. I guess its success is largely due to it being the first affordable alternative to other overpriced (way overpriced) tools. Magicdraw: I used Magicdraw for a while and really liked it but it is pricier for C# code engineering version ($899)and a whole lot heavier on the memory. Visual Paradigm: Found Visual Paradigm a little too hyped, heavy and unstable. ![]() I find it way better than Sparxx Enterprise Architect. iGrafx vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect: which is better Base your decision on 35 verified in-depth peer reviews and ratings, pros & cons, pricing, support and more. ArchiMate is a modeling language used to represent the architecture of an enterprise, while BPMN is used to model business processes. These guys are constantly adding new features and offer great professional support. It had the initial wow factor but its defects became visible quite soon. The primary difference between ArchiMate and BPMN is their purpose. Some others like Modelmaker, Metamill, Visual UML, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |